A Rising ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Affluence and Deprivation Are Found Side by Side in England.
In Nunsthorpe, inhabitants live in homes just a few metres from their more affluent neighbours in nearby Scartho village. A 1.8-metre-high wall physically separates the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off paths and streets that previously connected them.
“This is the divide between rich and poor,” remarked a resident, aged 37. “It has been there since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from government statistics reveals the extent of inequality often exists, sometimes over little more than a few metres of asphalt, a line of hedges or a wall. Years of budget cuts and lack of funding have led to a situation where a majority of councils now contain a neighbourhood classified as one of the poorest in the nation.
This geographical widening of deprivation has led to a sharp increase in the number of locations where disadvantaged and well-off residents end up living side by side. In 2019, only 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods adjoined one of the least deprived. That figure increased to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Divides More Than Land
In Grimsby, the divide is the most pronounced in the country and starkly apparent. The barrier transcends being just a symbolic divide; it causes very real difficulties for everyday life.
- The school commute that ought to take 15-20 minutes become an hour-long journey.
- Reaching key services like grocery stores, schools and employment centres is hindered.
- The area can attract antisocial behaviour, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and other problems.
“You try to maintain a well-kept home and garden, and then you live opposite that,” said one local, motioning at the rusted barricade.
Community Spirit Against a Backdrop of Challenges
At a local community centre, workers emphasise that support does not recognise addresses. “Where you live doesn’t necessarily indicate your level of challenge,” explained chief executive a community leader.
Despite being placed in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe retains a strong sense and sense of community among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, the neighbouring area is classified among the least deprived 10% overall.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This pattern is mirrored across the country. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century housing development, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in the country. It is closely bordered by large detached homes built in the early 2000s that are in the top 10% for job prospects and living environment.
“They might have bigger houses, but here there’s more community,” commented Phil Hockley, aged 63. “It’s likely many people over there don’t even speak to each other.”
The economic gap is evident: an average three-bedroom house costs about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while across the divide comparable properties go for about £410,000.
Locals describe a palpable sense of neglect. “This part of the community is neglected,” said resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our facilities have gradually disappeared, and most of the community problems here are to do with financial hardship.”
The rise in these ‘inequality borders’ paints a portrait of an increasingly divided society, where wealth and deprivation are often uncomfortably in close proximity.