🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to develop laws and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for further review if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in additional member states